Re: [PATCH] strptime

From: Ingo Brückl <ib_at_wupperonline.de>
Date: Wed Apr 04 2012 - 23:39:03 CEST

Hubert Figuière wrote on Wed, 04 Apr 2012 11:53:39 -0700:

> On 04/04/12 11:33 AM, Ingo Brückl wrote:
>> I haven't followed the discussion on strptime for Windows, but I'm
>> wondering why we are using it for non-Windows builds now.

> Simply put, because if you want to make sure we hit the same bug in all
> platform it is safer that way.

It doesn't make any sense to me to reimplement existing library code, and
I would bet that a library implementation is far safer, more flawless and
better maintained than copies of it.

> There are already enough issue with people stripping Gtk off their Linux
> machine to save a few bytes...

Really? No comment.

>> And BTW, there seem to be issues with the implementation:

> No it is just glibc.

Aha, so what's about "same bug in all platform" now?

Ingo
Received on Wed Apr 4 23:40:43 2012

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Apr 04 2012 - 23:40:43 CEST