Subject: Re: tabs - should we implement like buggy '97, or what?
From: Paul Rohr (paul@abisource.com)
Date: Tue Dec 07 1999 - 14:11:40 CST
At 10:34 PM 12/6/99 -0600, Stephen Hack wrote:
>here's what currently get implemented...
>
> ] <c tab> [
> 1 <tab> 2
> <tab> 3
> <tab> 4
> <tab> 5
> <tab> 6
> <tab> 101010101010
>10101010<tb> |
>
>It'll break long runs (even individual words) to the next line.
>
>-shack
If too many people complain, we may eventually need to change it. For now,
though, that sounds *entirely* reasonable.
Paul
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Tue Dec 07 1999 - 14:06:35 CST