Re: Scientific American says "No WP's"

Paul Rohr (paul@abisource.com)
Thu, 18 Mar 1999 11:22:57 -0800

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Shaw Terwilliger: "commit -- lots of Unix font changes"
Previous message: Eric W. Sink: "tree change: abi/src/wp/gr moved to abi/src/gr"
In reply to: goingware.com: "Scientific American says "No WP's""

At 03:46 PM 3/17/99 -0800, goingware.com wrote:
>In the current issue of Scientific American, there is an article about Open
>Source Software.
>
>But it says there are no word processors, and none are likely because such
>things don't appeal to hackers.

Thanks for pointing that out.

>Perhaps someone from Abisource would like to send a letter to the editor
>to let the Scientific American subscriber know where to get AbiWord.

We're on it.

Paul

Next message: Shaw Terwilliger: "commit -- lots of Unix font changes"
Previous message: Eric W. Sink: "tree change: abi/src/wp/gr moved to abi/src/gr"
In reply to: goingware.com: "Scientific American says "No WP's""

This archive was generated by hypermail 1.03b2.