Re: The tree seems fine...

Eric W. Sink (eric@sourcegear.com)
Fri, 8 Oct 1999 12:55:05 -0500


The tree is fixed.

And, the justification code looks quite nice. It leaves white gaps
when drawing the selections, but there are worse problems. :-)

--

On Fri, Oct 08, 1999 at 05:16:27PM +0100, Caolan McNamara wrote: > Return-Path: <owner-abiword-dev@sourcegear.com> > Received: (from majordomo@localhost) > by postman.sourcegear.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id MAA13916 > for abiword-dev-outgoing; Fri, 8 Oct 1999 12:50:34 -0500 > Received: (from andy@localhost) > by postman.sourcegear.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id MAA13910 > for abiword-dev@sourcegear.com; Fri, 8 Oct 1999 12:50:34 -0500 > Received: from mailgate2.ul.ie (mailgate2.ul.ie [136.201.1.2]) > by postman.sourcegear.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA11936 > for <abiword-dev@abisource.com>; Fri, 8 Oct 1999 11:55:33 -0500 > Received: from exch-staff1.ul.ie by mailgate2.ul.ie with SMTP (PP) > id <05887-0@mailgate2.ul.ie>; Fri, 8 Oct 1999 17:22:52 +0000 > Received: from metasyntax.idc.ul.ie ([136.201.107.65]) by exch-staff1.ul.ie > with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2448.0) > id 4JT9H77X; Fri, 8 Oct 1999 17:14:00 +0100 > Message-ID: <XFMail.991008172031.Caolan.McNamara@ul.ie> > X-Mailer: XFMail 1.1 [p0] on Linux > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit > MIME-Version: 1.0 > In-Reply-To: <19991008094021.D4713@sourcegear.com> > Date: Fri, 08 Oct 1999 17:16:27 +0100 (IST) > Organization: Interactive Design Center > From: Caolan McNamara <Caolan.McNamara@ul.ie> > To: "Eric W. Sink" <eric@sourcegear.com> > Subject: RE: The tree seems hosed... > Cc: abiword-dev@abisource.com > Sender: owner-abiword-dev@sourcegear.com > Precedence: bulk > Status: > > > On 08-Oct-99 Eric W. Sink wrote: > >I was eager to see the full justification code in action, but alas, it > >does not build for me. Is anyone else getting this problem? (Given > >the nature of the error below, I suspect it will break on almost any > >C++ compiler, but I *do* tend to update my Debian potato system quite > >often, so I never like to rule out the possibility that I got an > >unstable set of tools.) > > > >Anyway, here's the error: > > > >ie_imp_MsWord_97.cpp: > > > >ie_imp_MsWord_97.cpp:99: passing `int (*)(wvParseStruct *, wvTag, void *)' as > >argument 1 of `wvSetElementHandler(int (*)(wvParseStruct *, wvTag, void *, > >int))' > > > > Hmm, sorry about this, my mail warnings about the change appears to be about 4 > hours slow to leave the building, while my cvs updates are immediate. By the > time you get *this* im sure it obvious what the error is, add another int > argument to the end of the ElementHandler, this is the change as discussed > previously to flag that PAP or CHP is exactly the same as the style it is > based upon. > > C. > > >-- > >Eric W. Sink, Software Craftsman > >SourceGear Corporation > >eric@sourcegear.com > > Real Life: Caolan McNamara * Doing: MSc in HCI > Work: Caolan.McNamara@ul.ie * Phone: +353-86-8790257 > URL: http://www.csn.ul.ie/~caolan * Sig: an oblique strategy > Lost in useless territory

-- 
Eric W. Sink, Software Craftsman
SourceGear Corporation
eric@sourcegear.com


This archive was generated by hypermail 1.03b2.