Re: Table workaround


Subject: Re: Table workaround
From: Mike Nordell (tamlin@algonet.se)
Date: Wed Dec 20 2000 - 04:18:42 CST


Dom Lachowicz wrote:
> So the picture would be more like:
>
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> + IMAGE + This is "Foo" +
> + Hi + Yo + Guten Tag +
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Oh, now I get it. But if every "table-line" was a "layout-line" (not ==
fp_Line) and *it* took care of its cells height, and every cell got its own
layouter (which it would have to), then I fail to see the problem. Either
I'm too simplistic or to ignorant for my own good, or this is the way to do
it.

/Mike - please don't cc



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Wed Dec 20 2000 - 04:16:55 CST