Subject: RE: ANSI standards
From: James Montgomerie (jamie@montgomerie.net)
Date: Sun Jan 23 2000 - 17:31:18 CST
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rui Silva - Webmaster [mailto:rms@ssi.aaum.pt]
> Subject: Re: ANSI standards
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I can think of a reaso to use UT_strcmp, but I don't know if
> that is the one.
That's not the reason, at least not here. In all cases, it was implemented
in
the platform-specific files as a simple call to strcmp(...).
> > Does anyone know the reason we're implemening strcmp(...) as an
> intermediate
> > function, UT_strcmp(...), and putting the code in the
> platform-specific cpp
> > files (strcmp(...) /is/ ANSI)?
> >
> > I'm planning to take out the platform-specific versions and
> simply #define
> > UT_strcmp(x, y) to strcmp(x, y) if no-one can think of a reason why I
> > shouldn't.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Sun Jan 23 2000 - 17:28:41 CST