Subject: Re: 2 New Gnome Dialogs
From: sam th (sam@uchicago.edu)
Date: Sun Jul 30 2000 - 23:49:31 CDT
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 31 Jul 2000, Martin Sevior wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 30 Jul 2000, Dom Lachowicz wrote:
>
> > Question: how do people feel about using the default Gnome-print dialog in
> > Gnome builds instead of our current dialog? It looks a lot prettier, but
> > (currently) doesn't offer some of the persistance that our dialog does (# of
> > pages, filename, etc..). I'm for it, but others may be against.
> >
>
> Do you plan to implement gnome-print with the really cool print preview
> option? That would be really great. Plus we'll eventually be able to use
> the gnome-print PCL backends so we won't be limited to ghostscript to
> drive local non-ps printers.
>
> Could we eventually implement the persistence functionality?
Would the persistence be better implemented on our end, or on GNOME's
end? Do they have something against persistence? I'm sure someone
around here would be able to help them, if they want it.
sam th
sam@uchicago.edu
http://www.abisource.com/~sam/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE5hQVct+kM0Mq9M/wRArcuAKDdsMh4P6PvReR4iUNJ+fb3DWS/CQCg2jVo
977JYUf8zTFOQHvVMlcD4gk=
=X3CR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Sun Jul 30 2000 - 22:42:36 CDT