Subject: RE: commit -- libglade support
From: Paul Rohr (paul@abisource.com)
Date: Wed Feb 07 2001 - 13:54:37 CST
Joaquin,
You sure know how to make a guy happy! :-)
At 08:15 PM 2/7/01 +0100, Joaquin Cuenca Abela wrote:
>run-time. But anyway there are (nearly) no bloat. Just a bit the first
>time the user opens a gladeified dialog, and it's impossible to see the
>difference even in a old 486 (in fact, I'm pretty much sure you can see the
>difference even in a 386, but I have no 386 :)
Nice.
>And yes, the users should install libglade. But happily enough, there are
>many applis out there that depends in libglade, and pretty much everybody
>with gtk+ has libglade installed (for instance, gnumeric depends in
>libglade).
Great. Are we likely to run into versioning issues, or are the libglade
APIs pretty stable now?
>I will explain that point a bit more in a few hours... (I have to return to
>home right now)
>(but we can introduce gettext *without* touching the non-unix platforms).
Phew! That's a relief. I'm looking forward to hearing the details.
Paul
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Wed Feb 07 2001 - 13:46:59 CST