Subject: Re: commit -- libglade support
From: Sam TH (sam@uchicago.edu)
Date: Thu Feb 08 2001 - 22:35:13 CST
On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 03:29:12PM +1100, Martin Sevior wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Aaron Lehmann wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 07:11:39PM +0100, Joaquin Cuenca Abela wrote:
> > > yes. I prefer to see the libglade issues solved, but if there are not
> > > solved I (or Martin) will degladeify the dialog.
> >
> > I have a compromise.
> >
> > The GNOME build can use libglade. The GTK builds can use glade's code
> > generation feature to avoid the prohibutive dependencies.
> >
> > I despise the code that glade outputs, but I'm willing to offer this
> > comprise. And it's the most I'll budge on this point.
> >
>
> Never fear, Joaquin and I will deal with the output of glade, which is not
> too bad if you specify the variable names within it.
>
> I agree with Joaquin about leaving libglade support in place until the
> Lists dialog is finished. It is much easier to do protyping this way and
> we know how much heat the Lists dialog generates.
Martin,
what do you think about the CVS branch idea I suggested? That would
allow you and Joaquin to use Glade, and would prevent Aaron from
collapsing from hysteria. (no offense, aaron).
If you want to discuss this more deeply, lots of people are currently
wasting time on IRC.
sam th
sam@uchicago.edu
http://www.abisource.com/~sam/
GnuPG Key:
http://www.abisource.com/~sam/key
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Thu Feb 08 2001 - 22:34:04 CST