Re: Bug 1691


Subject: Re: Bug 1691
From: Nils Barth (nils_barth@post.harvard.edu)
Date: Fri Jul 13 2001 - 15:13:14 CDT


On 2001-07-13-15:21, Dom Lachowicz wrote:
> Quoting abiword@linuxfreemail.com:
>
> > I think bug 1691 should be re-opened. MS Word handles the "Change Case"
> > feature the right way IMO, but perhaps this needs further discussion.
>
> No, this bug and those marked as duplicates should not be reopened because our
> behavior is consistent and correct for our definition of these features.
>
> If you don't like our definitions (you seem to prefer MSWord's), please open
> *new* bugs with detailed descriptions of what you'd like to see happen.

I've done something like that in bug 1699 (verbose).

-- 
  -pookie



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Fri Jul 13 2001 - 15:05:28 CDT