Subject: Re: Topic: Versioning scheme and 1.0
From: WJCarpenter (bill-abisource@carpenter.ORG)
Date: Thu May 03 2001 - 13:35:17 CDT
dom> Well, I'm just not sure what our users will think of this. We
dom> might have the unwanted effect of confusing them, which would be
dom> bad.
People seem to have recovered nicely from when MS changed their
numbering scheme from "6" to "2000", and earlier when their
competitors jumped from "2" to "6" for brochure parity. Most of the
ritual suicides have tapered off. :-)
-- bill@carpenter.ORG (WJCarpenter) PGP 0x91865119 38 95 1B 69 C9 C6 3D 25 73 46 32 04 69 D6 ED F3
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Sat May 26 2001 - 03:51:01 CDT