From: Christian Biesinger (cbiesinger@web.de)
Date: Sat Apr 27 2002 - 10:16:29 EDT
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 03:05:12PM +0100, Andrew Dunbar wrote:
> It will probably make our UT_iconv stuff a lot
> simpler if it becomes a wrapper only for g_iconv as
> long as we can trust g_iconv as well as we can trust
> our current iconv trickery (:
I now had a look at
http://developer.gnome.org/doc/API/2.0/glib/glib-character-set-conversion.html
and it looks like the equivalent of UT_iconv is g_convert, not so much
g_iconv.
-- "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 27 2002 - 10:18:34 EDT