From: Rui Miguel Silva Seabra (rms@1407.org)
Date: Mon Sep 16 2002 - 13:45:47 EDT
On Mon, 2002-09-16 at 15:29, F J Franklin wrote:
> > Anyway, this manifested the fact that autogen is indeed b0rken for the
> > plugins......fjf can take care of this or give the word and I'll scrap
> > it.
> I don't think it's trivial to fix, and there's not much point. I think
> ditching autogen.sh & fixing the spec is the appropriate course of
> action...
The appropriate change in this case would be to add the configure script
to cvs, so the spec would not need to generate it in order to be able to
compile the plugins.
Rui
-- + No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown + Whatever you do will be insignificant, | but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi + So let's do it...? -- + No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown + Whatever you do will be insignificant, | but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi + So let's do it...? -- + No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown + Whatever you do will be insignificant, | but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi + So let's do it...?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Sep 16 2002 - 13:49:25 EDT