Re: RFC: latin ligatures

From: msevior_at_physics.unimelb.edu.au
Date: Tue Nov 18 2003 - 06:36:04 EST

Next message: Francis James Franklin: "commit: abiword-plugins (BOTH): Bugs 6077 & 6078"

Previous message: msevior_at_physics.unimelb.edu.au: "Re: RFC: latin ligatures"
In reply to: msevior_at_physics.unimelb.edu.au: "Re: RFC: latin ligatures"
Next in thread: tomasfrydrych_at_yahoo.co.uk: "win32 printing (was Re: RFC: latin ligatures)"
Next in thread: Hubert Figuiere: "Re: RFC: latin ligatures"
Next in thread: Dom Lachowicz: "Re: RFC: latin ligatures"
Reply: tomasfrydrych_at_yahoo.co.uk: "win32 printing (was Re: RFC: latin ligatures)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

>>
>> I have now fixed bug 5853 (ligating across formating boundary);
>> should I enable ligating for the handful of latin ligatures ('fi',
>> 'fl', etc.), or not?
>>
>
> HI Tomas,
> I think they should definitely be enabled in CVS HEAD. My
> personal opinion is that they should remain disabled for STABLE
> but Hub's opinion carries the most weight.
>

PS. Do you have any idea why the fonts we get while printing in Win32 HEAD
are so small?

Next message: Francis James Franklin: "commit: abiword-plugins (BOTH): Bugs 6077 & 6078"
Previous message: msevior_at_physics.unimelb.edu.au: "Re: RFC: latin ligatures"
In reply to: msevior_at_physics.unimelb.edu.au: "Re: RFC: latin ligatures"
Next in thread: tomasfrydrych_at_yahoo.co.uk: "win32 printing (was Re: RFC: latin ligatures)"
Next in thread: Hubert Figuiere: "Re: RFC: latin ligatures"
Next in thread: Dom Lachowicz: "Re: RFC: latin ligatures"
Reply: tomasfrydrych_at_yahoo.co.uk: "win32 printing (was Re: RFC: latin ligatures)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Nov 18 2003 - 06:36:21 EST