Re: RFC: latin ligatures

From: Hubert Figuiere (hfiguiere_at_teaser.fr)
Date: Tue Nov 18 2003 - 13:48:01 EST

Next message: Jim Hodapp: "Re: [Fwd: [Patents] MS Office 2003 XML patented]"

Previous message: Jordi Mas: "commit: fixes 5994"
In reply to: msevior_at_physics.unimelb.edu.au: "Re: RFC: latin ligatures"
Next in thread: tomasfrydrych_at_yahoo.co.uk: "Re: RFC: latin ligatures"
Next in thread: Dom Lachowicz: "Re: RFC: latin ligatures"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

According to msevior_at_physics.unimelb.edu.au <msevior_at_physics.unimelb.edu.au>:
> I think they should definitely be enabled in CVS HEAD. My
> personal opinion is that they should remain disabled for STABLE
> but Hub's opinion carries the most weight.

No. I'm not in favor of backporting this to STABLE2.

Hub

-- 
AbiWord maintainer - Lille, France
http://www.figuiere.net/hub/ 
GPG fingerprint: 6C44 DB3E 0BF3 EAF5 B433  239A 5FEE 05E6 A56E 15A3

Next message: Jim Hodapp: "Re: [Fwd: [Patents] MS Office 2003 XML patented]"
Previous message: Jordi Mas: "commit: fixes 5994"
In reply to: msevior_at_physics.unimelb.edu.au: "Re: RFC: latin ligatures"
Next in thread: tomasfrydrych_at_yahoo.co.uk: "Re: RFC: latin ligatures"
Next in thread: Dom Lachowicz: "Re: RFC: latin ligatures"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Nov 18 2003 - 13:47:19 EST