Re: RFC: iomega active disk

• Previous message: Rui Miguel Seabra: "Re: more info on the Iomega Active Disk SDK"
• In reply to: tomasfrydrych_at_yahoo.co.uk: "Re: RFC: iomega active disk"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Wed, 2003-11-19 at 11:30, tomasfrydrych_at_yahoo.co.uk wrote:
> I think the idea itself is good, but that is now why I am interested in
> that; it is the potential user base it might create for us.

Whilst popularity might be nice, do you seriously think that giving some
users a version of AbiWord that they can't use, modify and redistribute?

I don't think it is of any good for them. Iomega should change their
terms.

Rui

-- 
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
+ So let's do it...?
Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html

• application/pgp-signature attachment: This is a digitally signed message part

• Next message: Ryan Pavlik: "Minor UI bug"
• Previous message: Rui Miguel Seabra: "Re: more info on the Iomega Active Disk SDK"
• In reply to: tomasfrydrych_at_yahoo.co.uk: "Re: RFC: iomega active disk"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Nov 20 2003 - 17:58:17 EST