Re: Abi RPMs for RH9 again, was: Packaging wishes for 2.0.1

From: Rui Miguel Seabra (rms@1407.org)
Date: Wed Oct 22 2003 - 05:01:00 EDT

  • Next message: M. Fioretti: "Re: Abi RPMs for RH9 again, was: Packaging wishes for 2.0.1"

    On Tue, 2003-10-21 at 21:48, M. Fioretti wrote:
    > Absolutely right. But, my comments come just from the fact that the
    > previous GTk RPM wanted a libfribidi0 which is *not* in the fribidi
    > RPMs available for RH9. Check my messages here for details.

    Marco, you're talking about the packages that are in RedHat's rawhide,
    which may even not be used at all in the next release, and not about
    RH9.

    If you're really willing to use those, it also isn't that hard to do the
    following:

    useradd builder
    su - builder
    mkdir -p redhat/{BUILD,SOURCES,SPECS,SRPMS,RPMS/{i{3,4,5,6}86,noarch}}
    cat <<EOF >>.rpmmacros
    %_topdir /home/builder/redhat
    %debug_package %{nil}
    EOF
    rpm -ivh abiword-2.0.0-1.src.rpm
    vi redhat/SPECS/abiword.spec
         Change as appropriate
    rpmbuild -ba redhat/SPECS/abiword.spec 

    -- 
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
+ So let's do it...?

    Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Oct 22 2003 - 04:58:09 EDT