Re: Abi RPMs for RH9 again, was: Packaging wishes for 2.0.1

From: Rui Miguel Seabra (rms@1407.org)
Date: Wed Oct 22 2003 - 06:34:26 EDT

  • Next message: Marc Maurer: "Re: Abi RPMs for RH9 again, was: Packaging wishes for 2.0.1"

    On Wed, 2003-10-22 at 10:22, M. Fioretti wrote:
    > *if* the fribidi rpms on savannah and those on rawhide are different,

    They probably are. RedHat tends to use their own RPM specs unless they
    contributed the specs to the package. That may have changed with Fedora
    Core since it gets to be more community based.

    > *if* fedora core doesn't provide a gnome-less Abiword 2 RPM, and one
    > wants to build it relying as much as possible on *other* existing
    > Fedora RPMs... hence come similar questions.

    I don't know which specs are used, or if RedHat's are flexible or not,
    in Fedora Core.

    > If I understand correctly, Fedora Core 1 will be released at the end
    > of the month. Considering that, the release of abiword 2.0.1 and the
    > fact that we at RULE will switch to Fedora Core asap, I will probably
    > wait and retry with all the latest versions.

    hmms.. end of month. Ok.

    Thanks, Rui

    -- 
    + No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
    + Whatever you do will be insignificant,
    | but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
    + So let's do it...?
    

    Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html




    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Oct 22 2003 - 06:31:41 EDT