Re: Abi RPMs for RH9 again, was: Packaging wishes for 2.0.1

From: Marc Maurer (j.m.maurer@student.utwente.nl)
Date: Wed Oct 22 2003 - 07:10:16 EDT

Next message: Kenneth J. Davis: "Re: Packaging wishes for 2.0.1"

Previous message: Rui Miguel Seabra: "Re: Abi RPMs for RH9 again, was: Packaging wishes for 2.0.1"
In reply to: Rui Miguel Seabra: "Re: Abi RPMs for RH9 again, was: Packaging wishes for 2.0.1"
Next in thread: Rui Miguel Seabra: "Re: Abi RPMs for RH9 again, was: Packaging wishes for 2.0.1"
Next in thread: Rui Miguel Seabra: "Re: Abi RPMs for RH9 again, was: Packaging wishes for 2.0.1"
Reply: Rui Miguel Seabra: "Re: Abi RPMs for RH9 again, was: Packaging wishes for 2.0.1"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

> AFAICT, the fribidi developers don't publish rpms, but I think their
> source is rpm'able.
>

They do publish fribidi rpms, which work just fine on my stock RH. Why
is 'everyone' trying to get other rpms everywhere? They work and provide
all the stuff you need:
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=2722

Marc

Next message: Kenneth J. Davis: "Re: Packaging wishes for 2.0.1"
Previous message: Rui Miguel Seabra: "Re: Abi RPMs for RH9 again, was: Packaging wishes for 2.0.1"
In reply to: Rui Miguel Seabra: "Re: Abi RPMs for RH9 again, was: Packaging wishes for 2.0.1"
Next in thread: Rui Miguel Seabra: "Re: Abi RPMs for RH9 again, was: Packaging wishes for 2.0.1"
Next in thread: Rui Miguel Seabra: "Re: Abi RPMs for RH9 again, was: Packaging wishes for 2.0.1"
Reply: Rui Miguel Seabra: "Re: Abi RPMs for RH9 again, was: Packaging wishes for 2.0.1"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Oct 22 2003 - 07:04:11 EDT