Dom Lachowicz wrote:
>Though you most probably have good arguments for your
>position (I do as well - e.g. plugin incompatibility)
>
>
I've heard this mentioned a few times but never could get any
specifics. What exactly is the issue with our MinGW-built binaries and
"plugin incompatibility"?
Received on Mon Dec 20 21:18:05 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Dec 20 2004 - 21:18:05 CET