On 17/05/04 20:00:07, Marc Maurer wrote:
> Do you even proof read these AWN's ? Man, I found some serious
> errors in there, which are, like *huge*... For example, everyone
> knows that in AWN #196, "lucious" should be "luscious"*. I'm no
> longer interested in AWN's as they seem much to error-prone. **
To answer the honest question at the beginning: Not the past six.
The first two were the result of carelessness, the last four out of,
"GAH! IT TOOK TOO LONG! GET IT OUT NOW! BAH!" I couldn't come up
with a single word for that one.
>
> PS: ***
I get that; it's just nice to read it every once in awhile.
I've made corrections to the most luscious and desirable AWN yet ;o)
-Eric
<rob enderle sig>
Received on Tue May 18 03:05:43 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue May 18 2004 - 03:05:43 CEST