On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 08:28 +0100, Tomas Frydrych wrote:
> Unfortunately, there has been virtually no work done on Mac on the 2.3
> branch in the six months we have been working toward 2.4. It is not
> clear to me why the guys choose the work on the 2.2 branch, but the
> consequence of that is that as far as 2.4 is concerned, Mac OS X
> non-issue for the time of the 2.4 release.
Because 2.2.x is so low in quality that WE try to address problem in
there. Note that these fixes are integrated into HEAD.....
>
> Just to make this very clear: it is not that we are trying to release
> too early ignoring the Mac port, but simply that for six months no work
> has been done on the HEAD of the Mac, and that it is unfair to everyone
> else who has been working hard toward the 2.4 release for the past six
> month to have to hold the release indefinitely because this.
Who said indefinitely ?
Hub
-- Crazy French - http://www.figuiere.net/hub/Received on Tue Jul 5 14:17:53 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jul 05 2005 - 14:17:53 CEST