Re: Old feature branches

From: Kathiravelu Pradeeban <kk.pradeeban_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed Mar 02 2011 - 19:34:28 CET

Thanks Alex for bringing this up.

On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 9:46 PM, J.M. Maurer <uwog@uwog.net> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 10:43 +0600, áÌÅËÓ wrote:
>>
>> What is the current state of branches gsoc2008flicker,
>
> This was a failed Google SOC project to make our canvas double-buffered,
> and can safely be deleted deleted. I just did that.
>
>> šgsoc2009gettext
>
> This is a branch that moved our codebase to gettext, and also made our
> plugins translatable. We should get that up to speed, and merge it IMO.
> One of the biggest problems was that the dialogs on Unix and Windows
> where translated using a different mechanism in this branch. Not sure if
> the Windows dialogs were updated at all to be honest.
>
> We should definitely look into this.
>
>> gsoc2009tablelayout
>
> Improvements to our table layout code. Martin knows the status best. Or
> did we already merge this?
>
>> and gsoc2010dialogs? Are they abandoned forever? Are they ready to be
>> merged? Are they still actual?
>
> Improvements to the format table and textbox dialogs iirc. If it is not
> merged already, then we should do that.
>
> If Maleesh is still on this list: how ready was/is this branch?

I hope merging the gsoc2010dialogs branch (or any other branch) won't
break any later fixes that we did to the trunk w.r.t Win/Unicode.
Maleesh, could you please update the list about the status of the branch?

Thank you.
Regards,
Pradeeban.

>
> Cheers!
> šMarc
>
>

-- 
Kathiravelu Pradeeban.
Software Engineer.
WSO2 Inc.
Blog: [Llovizna] http://kkpradeeban.blogspot.com/
Received on Wed Mar 2 19:35:09 2011

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Mar 02 2011 - 19:35:09 CET