Re: SLP Package Report

Shaw Terwilliger (sterwill@postman.abisource.com)
Thu, 10 Jun 1999 09:38:48 -0500


On Thu, Jun 10, 1999 at 01:35:39AM -0400, outlyer@stampede.org wrote:
> I tried your Stampede SLP package, and I am pleased to say it worked perfectly,
> right out of the box. Generally speaking however, the main advantage of
> Stampede packages is that the binaries and libraries are stripped, and optimizedwith Pentium GCC. There are currently AbiWord packages being developed by developers in the Stampede distribution, but they've been rather flaky. I'd appreciate if I could see what tools you used to build the single package. Or at least
> the gist of the process.

Well, the binary which went into the Stampede package was compiled
with EGCS 1.1.1 (I should upgrade to 1.1.2) for C and C++. The binary
should have been stripped after the process; if it wasn't it's a bug
in the distribution packages. The CFLAGS were normal (for Linux)
optimizations, which are just -Wall -W -O2. I often use EGCS's
-mpentiumpro -march=pentiumpro when building my own binaries, but
not those for general release. This isn't to say that it shouldn't
be done "the right way." :)

The Stampede package binaries were built using Alien, but that
process can be easily replaced through some Makefile hacking.
Right now the file abi/src/pkg/linux/Makefile has a slp: target
which does the work. Making it do a "native" build, using
Stampede tools for the process, should be a matter of looking at
the way the rpm: target meets its needs. If you're familiar with
RPM, you'll know that building a package with it sucks. :)

-- 
Shaw Terwilliger


This archive was generated by hypermail 1.03b2.