Subject: Re: PATCH: Fix for printing symbols and variable width underlining.
sterwill@abisource.com
Date: Mon Jan 10 2000 - 17:01:55 CST
Martin Sevior wrote:
> My reading of page 700 (which is the sum total of my knowledge of the
> subject) is that stroke clears the current PATH so that another stroke
> command doesn't include what has already been written out in another line
> drawing operation. The receipe given on page 700 would mean that every
> underline would be redrawn after each stroke. Clearly we don't want that! I
> guess that it leaves the GC in its current state. I agree that putting
> stroke into ML would probabally work and would be cleaner.
It seems right to put it in ML, so that any new GC functions build
using line width and drawing will work properly.
-- Shaw Terwilliger
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Mon Jan 10 2000 - 17:01:56 CST