Gnotices coverage

Subject: Gnotices coverage
From: Tim Allen (tim@proximity.com.au)
Date: Sun Feb 25 2001 - 22:10:43 CST

• sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: Aaron Lehmann: "Re: Gnotices coverage"
• Previous message: Martin Sevior: "commit: List labels are UT_UCSChar's now."
• Next in thread: Aaron Lehmann: "Re: Gnotices coverage"
• Reply: Aaron Lehmann: "Re: Gnotices coverage"
• Reply: Martin Sevior: "Re: Gnotices coverage"

I just checked the coverage in Gnotices, and was surprised to see that the
feedback is mainly positive! Must be a first. AFAICT, none of the usual
whining about the "costs" of cross-platform development slowing the
project down, or about how C++ is evil because the poster doesn't
understand it. Possible explanations:

1) the quality of discourse on Gnotices has improved

2) AbiWord has, by sheer persistence, established itself better in Gnomish
hearts and minds

3) AbiWord is now actually good enough that finding serious fault is a
task beyond the typical Gnotices whinger

I suspect a combination of 2 and 3 :-).

Tim

-- 
-----------------------------------------------
Tim Allen          tim@proximity.com.au
Proximity Pty Ltd  http://www.proximity.com.au/
  http://www4.tpg.com.au/users/rita_tim/

• Next message: Aaron Lehmann: "Re: Gnotices coverage"
• Previous message: Martin Sevior: "commit: List labels are UT_UCSChar's now."
• Next in thread: Aaron Lehmann: "Re: Gnotices coverage"
• Reply: Aaron Lehmann: "Re: Gnotices coverage"
• Reply: Martin Sevior: "Re: Gnotices coverage"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Sun Feb 25 2001 - 22:11:19 CST