Re: Bug Status

Subject: Re: Bug Status
From: Tom Briggs (tomabi@jules.briggs.cx)
Date: Sun Mar 11 2001 - 12:10:44 CST

• sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: Dom Lachowicz: "Re: TODO icons and labels (was Re: how should we localize locale names?)"
• Previous message: Tom Briggs: "Re: TODO icons and labels (was Re: how should we localize locale names?)"
• In reply to: Jesper Skov: "Re: Bug Status"
• Next in thread: Michael D. Pritchett: "Re: Bug Status"
• Next in thread: Jesper Skov: "Re: Bug Status"
• Reply: Tom Briggs: "Re: Bug Status"

On Sun, 11 Mar 2001, Jesper Skov wrote:

> http://www.abisource.com/mailinglists/abiword-user/01/February/0056.html

   This was a good write-up, but it's missing one critical piece of
information: what should happen after a bug gets marked QA TO
VERIFY? What's the process for officially marking it as closed? Under
what criteria can a bug fix be considered verified? Can I verify my own
bugs if using an official release containing the fix?

   (These are all rhetorical questions, of course. I know the
answers. :P The otherwise complete write-up just seems to be missing info
about the last part of the bug life-cycle. )

   -Tom

• Next message: Dom Lachowicz: "Re: TODO icons and labels (was Re: how should we localize locale names?)"
• Previous message: Tom Briggs: "Re: TODO icons and labels (was Re: how should we localize locale names?)"
• In reply to: Jesper Skov: "Re: Bug Status"
• Next in thread: Michael D. Pritchett: "Re: Bug Status"
• Next in thread: Jesper Skov: "Re: Bug Status"
• Reply: Tom Briggs: "Re: Bug Status"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Sun Mar 11 2001 - 12:46:40 CST