Re: RFC: future develpment/release strategy

From: Tomas Frydrych (tomas@frydrych.uklinux.net)
Date: Tue Jun 25 2002 - 06:41:12 EDT

  • Next message: James Ogley: "Re: Speaking about AbiWord"

    Hi Martin,

    > > My main reason for this suggestion is that it will take a while
    > > before we have a 2.0 release with the Pango stuff; things are moving
    > > along slower than I have been hoping.
    >
    > Is this because the work is much harder than you thought or because
    > you haven't had the time to work on it?

    I have had less time recently for this than I expected, but also Dom
    made some changes to HEAD in preparation for the Gtk2 work that
    made it impossible for me to compile the Pango stuff (problems with
    mixing glib1 and glib2), and I have not got gtk2 installed yet to work
    on the gtk2 branch instead. So I am eagerly awaiting the gtk2 stuff
    going to HEAD, then I will get myself gtk2 and resume the Pango
    work.

    > Hmmm this will be a pain. How much work will be done on the XP parts
    > of pango in within the next few months?
    >
    > Maybe it would be better to freeze XP related pango developement until
    > after 1.2? I guess it depends on your assessment of how long before
    > pango itself is ready for a prime time XP environment.

    I am planing to keep working on it; I do not mind it remaining within
    #ifdef WITH_PANGO for the foreseable future, as long as care is
    taken that any generic layout fixes are done in the Pango sections
    as well as much as possible.

    From the XP point of view the bigest issue is getting Pango/Glib2
    available on the non-*nix platforms, and as no-one seems to be
    looking into this, it could take years :-(.

    Tomas



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jun 25 2002 - 06:46:21 EDT