Re: GNOME HIG and libglade2

From: Martin Sevior (msevior@physics.unimelb.edu.au)
Date: Tue Feb 04 2003 - 21:56:24 EST

  • Next message: Pierre Abbat: "Re: ja-JP.po update"

    On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 11:01, Dom Lachowicz wrote:
    > > I also tend not to want more library dependencies.
    > > What about adding this stuff only for the Gnome
    > > build?
    >
    > This defeats the proposed purposes for using glade.
    >
    > Win32 has RC files to aide in the creation and storage
    > of dialogs, created by DevC.
    >
    > Cocoa has NIB files to aide in the creation and
    > storage of dialogs, created by InterfaceBuilder.
    >
    > I see no difference in using glade on the unix
    > platforms. Further, it is a standard library installed
    > by every Linux distribution.
    >
    > Ideally, using glade will enable us to make prettier,
    > more user-friendly HIG-complaint dialogs with less
    > fuss and more quickly. If this comes at the expense of
    > some user not knowing that his AbiWord is linked
    > against libglade (coz in all likelihood it's already
    > installed) then so be it. It's a trade-off that I'm
    > more than willing and eager to make in order that our
    > product comes off looking more polished and friendly
    > with (potentially significantly) less effort.
    >
    > Adding a 100k library dependancy for these purposes
    > should not be construed as bloat.
    >

    I basically 100% agree with Dom and I'm looking forward to HIG - ized
    dialogs starting with Format Footnotes :-)

    I finally read a bit of it and it's clear that doing this properly is
    much more easily done with glade.

    Cheers

    Martin

    > Dom
    >
    > __________________________________________________
    > Do you Yahoo!?
    > Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
    > http://mailplus.yahoo.com

    -- 
    Martin Sevior <msevior@physics.unimelb.edu.au>
    University of Melbourne
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Feb 04 2003 - 21:52:31 EST