Re: More thoughts on AbiShow

From: Dom Lachowicz (domlachowicz@yahoo.com)
Date: Thu Nov 06 2003 - 23:24:36 EST

  • Next message: Michael D. Crawford: "Export as minimal XHTML?"

    > Well, it's just funny that people is working on 2.2
    > when STABLE needs so much
    > work. It's very interesting and necessary to add new
    > features, but it seems
    > that there is very few people interested in making
    > Abiword into a real useful
    > tool.

    I don't think that you could be any more wrong,
    actually. Or perhaps you've been oblivious to how much
    back-porting there has been. I think the rough
    estimate was 150 individual patches backported from
    HEAD into STABLE between 2.0.0 and 2.0.1. This is
    beside the work done exclusively in STABLE.

    STABLE is getting a lot of work from a lot of
    different people. And a lot of bug fixes. And most of
    those bug fixes are coming from the HEAD tree. HEAD is
    not exclusively for implementing new features. It's
    also for fixing classes of bugs that shouldn't happen
    in a "STABLE" series. HEAD is supposed to lead to the
    next STABLE series. And goddamnit, in about 5 months,
    it will.

    We all paid our dues getting 2.0 where it is, and
    getting 2.0.1 (and soon 2.0.2) out the door. It's not
    without its flaws. No software ever is. We did 4
    painful months of exclusively bugfixing before
    releasing 2.0. Don't let me catch anyone forgetting
    that. Ever.

    Annoyed,
    Dom

    __________________________________
    Do you Yahoo!?
    Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard
    http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Nov 06 2003 - 23:22:33 EST