Re: design q -- simplifying the spell dialog UI

Thomas Fletcher (thomasf@qnx.com)
Thu, 14 Oct 1999 12:52:04 -0400


On Thu, 14 Oct 1999, Paul Rohr wrote:

> At 08:03 AM 10/14/99 -0400, Thomas Fletcher wrote:
> >I don't think that it would be a big deal if you are just looking at
> >the unformatted text in the preview (as opposed to a mixed combination
> >of fonts, styles, sizes etc). We got editable text boxes on BeOS to
> >ya know =;-). Of course an XP solution would rock, but I'd be happy
> >to make the text box editable.
>
> Yeah, for richer formatting, we'll definitely want an XP solution. Later.
>
> Even now, I'm not sure we can do without formatting entirely, though. The
> current read-only preview isn't completely unformatted -- it changes the
> color of the misspelled word in context.
>
> On GTK, this capability is built into the basic editable text control.
> On Win32, we have to switch from an edit control to a rich edit control.
>
> Any ideas on how we should handle this now using existing BeOS widgets?

I should be able to provide some colour highlighting for the problem
word. I'm more interested in knowing how this stream of text
will get re-inserted into the document without loosing format
information.

[ascii art deleted]

I'll use the ascii art method as a fallback position if required.

Thomas

-------------------------------------------------------------
Thomas (toe-mah) Fletcher QNX Software Systems
thomasf@qnx.com Neutrino Development Group
(613)-591-0931 http://www.qnx.com/~thomasf



This archive was generated by hypermail 1.03b2.