Subject: Re: integrating bidi (was Re: version 1.0)
From: Sam TH (sam@uchicago.edu)
Date: Tue Feb 06 2001 - 15:14:38 CST
On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 08:56:11PM -0000, Tomas Frydrych wrote:
> The one thing that would make this number immediately smaller
> would be if we could agree to change the signature of the
> findPointCoords functions to that required by bidi; this is
> responsible for the worst and most confusing #ifdef's.
It looks the the current signature is:
virtual void findPointCoords(UT_uint32 iOffset, UT_sint32& x,
UT_sint32& y, UT_sint32& height);
What do you want to change it to? This is a change that shouldn't be
too hard.
On second thought, why can't this just be overloaded?
> PS I will make a fresh bidi patch over the weekend.
Sounds good.
sam th
sam@uchicago.edu
http://www.abisource.com/~sam/
GnuPG Key:
http://www.abisource.com/~sam/key
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Tue Feb 06 2001 - 15:13:51 CST